The Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in caves south of Jerusalem in 1947, but the significance of these documents, many of which date from the first century of the Common Era, was kept from the world for nearly fifty years. In 1991 a man named Herschel Shanks, editor of the Biblical Archeology Review, working in close alliance with Biblical scholars, broke the Vatican's control on DSS research and translation. (The story is told in The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception, listed in recommended reading under Basic Orientation to Metahistory.) The main scholar whose work on the DSS led the breakthrough, and entirely redefined Biblical studies, was Robert Eisenman. His interpretation of the content of the scrolls, and, even more importantly, of their authorship, completely upsets all previous theories of the origins of Christianity.
One of the most widespread beliefs about the religion founded on the person of Jesus Christ is that it somehow grew out of ancient Judaism, the tribal religion of the Hebrews dating back to the time of the patriarch Abraham (circa 1800 BCE). As the story goes, Jesus was a reformist rabbi who looked beyond doctrinal Judaism toward ethical teachings that apply to humankind universally, rather than to the Jews as a separate race, or even as the "Chosen People," but he was not merely that. He also was (or came to be considered, by the influence of Saint Paul) a superhuman or supernatural agent of God's will. In some manner, which is endlessly explained by apologists, the wrathful Father God of the Old Testament has been equated with the loving Father in Heaven who sent a supernatural intercessor, his only-begotten son, Jesus, to redeem the sins of the world. This schizophrenic formula is the basis of the salvationist creed of Abrahamic religions.
Although orthodox Jews reject Jesus as the long-awaited "Messiah" of their pre-Christian faith, and deny the superhuman status attributed to "Jesus Christ," most Christians assume that Jesus really was the messianic figure the ancient Jews were expecting, and they insist on his unique status of divinity.
Eisenman's work, supplemented by the investigations of other scholars such as Hugh Schonfield and John Allegro, shows that the rites, ethics and ideology of Christianity did not emerge from mainstream Judaism, but from the beliefs held by a minor sect of ultraradical Jews who were violently at odds with their own tradition. In no way was Christianity a simple outgrowth of the everyday Judaism that flourished in ancient Palestine, maintaining a peaceful coexistence with Pagan religion in its rainbow coalition of local cults and sects. Devout Jews of the preChristian era followed strict rules of hygeine and ritual, certainly, but they did not impose their way of life on non-Jews. And they did not evangelize. Like Paganism, Palestinian Judaism was innately tolerant, adopting a social philosophy of live and let live. Scholars such as Martin Hengel (Judaism and Hellenism, 1974) have shown that Judaism, even in its strictest orthodoxy, coexisted peacefully with the Greco-Oriental Mysteries in ancient Palestine, including the cult centers where Gnostic taught and initiated.
The Zaddikim were anything but tolerant, however. They intended to impose their views on the entire world — or the world be damned. In fact, this little-known sect introduced into the religious life of humanity the notion of a superhuman standard for human behavior, a standard impossible to realize in human and corporeal terms. Tzaddik, "absolute righteousness," is not just an ideal for good behavior: it is a callous demand for conformity to an impossible standard of purity and self-control, an inhumane ideal. The minute sect who lived in self-exile in the caves by the Dead Sea were infected with the belief that they were, if not better than the rest of humanity, at least cognizant of what was required to be better, to excel and surpass the human race, to be tzaddik, pure and righteous. This ideal was incorporated by Christianity into the figure of the human/divine hybrid, Jesus Christ.
Of course, the entire Jewish world awaited the coming of the Messiah, their racial-religious liberator, since the days of the Babylonian Exile (circa 600 BCE). But the Zaddikkim sect held special notions regarding the identity of the long-awaited King. According to the secret teachings of the Zaddikite elect, even the Messiah (who was in fact two Messiahs in one, but that is another story) was not the ultimate model, for there was a power hidden behind the Messiah, and that power alone was the ultimate source of spiritual authority for the Zaddikite elect. The name of this entity was rarely spoken, and his operations were jealously guarded from the time of the first Jewish king, Saul.
Yet Saul of Tarsus, who became known as the Apostle Paul, arrogantly declared the secret teaching he had received in Damascus when he was abducted, brainwashed, and converted to the Zaddikite cause (as Robert Eisenman explains, or as may be inferred from his explanations of the political features of the DSS). It is extremely strange that theologians and lay devotees of the Christian faith studiously ignore the bizarre disclosure of their highest ideologue, Saint Paul. It occurs in Hebrews, Chapter 5, where Paul discusses the authority of the priesthood he hopes to establish through faith in the divine-human hybrid, Christ / Jesus:
Paul explains that to have a messiah, literally "the anointed," one must have an anointer. The Hebrew word "messiah" was applied to a Jewish king anointed with holy oil, after the model of the entronement of sacred kings throughout the Middle East. (The adoption of the rites of sacred kingship by the ancient Hebrews was an anomaly, an aberration in their religious life — but that, too, is another story. See Not in His Image.) Christ, from the Greek verb khrio, "anointing," is Paul's substitution for "messiah." Both Christ and messiah mean "the anointed one," but with the shift from Hebrew to Greek this term acquires a supernatural spin. Or to say it otherwise, in the Pauline Christ the secret, superhuman identity of the Zaddikite messiah becomes disclosed.
Chirst is the Anointed One, as every Christian knows. But who did the anointing? For someone to be anointed, there must be someone of a higher spiritual standing, a higher authority who anoints. Anointing is a rite of empowerment, but the transfer of power must be from the anointer, who bestows it, to the anointed, who receives it. In his amazing disclosure, Paul declares the obvious: Christ the Messiah must receive his power and authority from elsewhere: "Christ glorified not himself to be made a high priest." Most theologians would argue that it is from the Father God, Jehovah, that the anointing power derives, and that it was symbolically enacted through the baptism by John in the Jordan, but Paul tells a different story. He attributes the power to anoint (or ordain) Christ specifically to a secret agent, Melchizedek. This name means "prince or regent" (melchi-) of "righteousness" (zaddik).
Paul continues his disclosure of Zaddikite secret doctrine by describing in a specific manner the nature of the Anointer, Melchizedek:
Search where you will, but you will rarely find a reference to Melchizedek as the spiritual authority behind Christ. Apart from Paul's astonishing disclosure, this figure is only mentioned a few times in the Bible. In the Old Testament (Genesis, 14) , Melchizedek, accompanied by two other angelic figures, appears to Abraham at the grove of Mamre. This meeting has widely been interpreted as an ET encounter "of the fourth kind" in ET/UFO lore and Biblical Ufology. Anyone who closely reads Paul's description of Melchizedek may well wonder what kind of entity is being indicated. A human or humanoid form that is neither born nor dies, has no parentage or genetics in human terms, and lives perpetually, i.e., in possession of virtual immortality — what manner of creature is this? Today we have a word for it, a word that begins, like Christ, with a c.
Melchizedek is the secret agent behind the Zaddikite ideology of impossible perfection, which also implies retribution for all those who do not meet the transhuman ideal, or who harm and oppose those who revere the transhuman ideal, the faithful ones who look to it for their salvation, for their release from the human condition.
The transhuman ideal
the dominator mindset (cf. Terence McKenna, Riane Eisler) that operates
in the religious-political alliance of the global power game.
It is the driving complex behind the NWO agenda of pyramidal domination of human society on the planetary scale. Whether those who propagate the ideal are Nazis or Neocon. Lately it is pretty hard to tell the difference, if there is one—but the effect is
the same: dissociation from the human condition and alienation from
the body ("the basic schizoid position," Sherpard, p. 85).
But Gnostics, who could stand in the darkness even while they downloaded the Organic Light, were aware of what hides in the shadows of the human psyche. Among the Mystery centers in Palestine was the encampment of the Archontics, just below Qumran Khirbet on the west bank of the Dead Sea. (See map in The Gnostic Scriptures by Bentley Layton.) Gnostic seers detected the Archons by the paranormal faculties they acquired through training in the Mysteries. Such was their expertise as parapsychologists. But as social psycologists, they also perceived the infection of an alien mindset in the doctrines of the Zealots or Zaddikites. They recognized a supernatural or extra-human element in the social-religious paradigm of the Zaddikim, which may be compared to a UFO salvation cult. Like the Heaven's Gate UFO cult of Applewhite and Nettles, whose members (including a close personal friend of this writer) killed themselves en mass in March 1997, the Zaddikim of the Dead Sea were also suicidal. They made their last stand at Masada in 73 AD. But the Zaddikite impulse lives on, now infecting humanity globally with a suicidal mania disguised in religious beliefs and perverted into a war on terrorism.
In violation of their sacred vow of anonymity, some Gnostics came out openly and protested the Judeo-Christian ideology of the Divine Redeemer, the Christ-Messiah anointed by Melchizedek. They warned against the "counterfeiting spirit" (antimimon) of the Archons, "who lead Adam astray so that it might lose its connection to the Pleroma" (The Apocryphon of John, II, 21). For Gnostics, "Adam" was the code-word for the true humanitas, as well as for our capacity to recognize it: to know ourselves in both the divine and human perspectives. They attributed the virulent and hateful emotions of the Zaddakite fanatics, horrifically evident in the language of the Dead Sea Scrolls, to madness due to Archontic deviation:
This passage reads like an inventory of the violent, genophobic emotions expressed in page after page of the Qumranic writings. It ends with the astute observation that, as horrible as these feelings are, they are useful to some people. Wonder who that could be?
The beliefs of the Zaddikim present some of the most intolerant and hateful ideas ever spawned by the human mind. Both in language and content, the Dead Sea Scrolls literally seethe with hatred. In passage after passage, these sectarian writings incite racial and religious violence. They are blatant testaments to virulent and genocidal rage. They alternately scream damnation and plead for retribution. They call for the destruction of the world by supernatural powers so that those faithful to the ideal of tzaddik can be "culled" from the lot, rescued from the well-deserved damnation of the human race. The Tzaddikim resemble a combination of the Branch Davidians of Waco and the Heaven's Gate suicide cult, with all the worst features of these sects magnified to the tenth degree.
And this madness was the ideological germ of Christian religion.
Gnostic spies on the Dead Sea who attempted to alert the general population to the dangers of Zaddikite salvationist ideology were silenced, and the Mystery Schools were targeted for eradication, "spiritual cleansing." But in the fragments of Gnostic teaching that survive, the warning is clear enough: